Does Debian need the local host name in /etc/hosts for IPv6?

To avoid the extra DNS lookups, the Exim packages have a Debconf option to configure exim for “minimal DNS usage”, which hardcodes the hostname into Exim’s configuration at package configuration time. This was necessary since - without this option - exim looks up its own host name in the DNS even when a completely local operation is invoked.

In some cases, exim still looks up its IP address when a listening daemon starts up. This is why the Debian installer configures 127.0.1.1 (not 127.0.0.1) for the local hostname on installation, yielding /etc/hosts files like

127.0.0.1       localhost
127.0.1.1       myfoo.localdomain   myfoo

# The following lines are desirable for IPv6 capable hosts
::1     ip6-localhost ip6-loopback
fe00::0 ip6-localnet
ff00::0 ip6-mcastprefix
ff02::1 ip6-allnodes
ff02::2 ip6-allrouters
ff02::3 ip6-allhosts

However, in the last few weeks I have heard a few cases where exim does IPv6 AAAA lookups when a listening daemon starts up. An strace shows a gethostbyname2 call for AF_INET6, and if we want to continue the line we went in the past, we’d need an IPv6 address for myfoo.localdomain in /etc/hosts as well.

I am now wondering how this could be implemented. In IPv4, we have 127.0.0.0/8 available for the local host and could arbitrarily choose 127.0.1.1 to configure the local host name on. In IPv6, there is only ::1, which is a single address. Would it be possible to choose an arbitrary “link local” address on lo, the loopback interface? Or is there any better way?

This being said, I consider the entire 127.0.1.1 business a horrible hack which is one of the most ugly things I have ever seen. Do we have a chance to implement this in a more cleaner way, or is it still the way to go for the distribution, where we don’t know zilch about the environment where an installed system is going to be used?

This issue leads to people adding their local host name to ::1 in /etc/hosts, which might re-introduce other issues that we experienced in a phase when we did the same for 127.0.0.1, eventually ending up with 127.0.1.1, or to disabling IPv6 altogether, which is a bad thing in a time where IPv6 should be enabled, not disabled. So I’d like to find a clean solution which could then be implemented in whatever part of Debian might be responsible.

I tried asking this question in other places, including Usenet, before pestering my Blog to ask the Lazyweb, but obviously the people I asked before do not care for the special environment that a Linux distribution has to take care of. The only answers I got were like “that would be the local administrator’s task to fix” and “this should be taken care of in the local DNS server/setup (maybe even on the local box being installed)”. A quite frustrating experience.

Update 2008-04-15

The issue seems solved. To avoid the extra DNS lookups, the Debian Exim packages have a Debconf option to configure exim for “minimal DNS usage”, which hardcodes the hostname into Exim’s configuration at package configuration time. This - silently - doesn’t happen if hostname --fqdn does not return a fully qualified name (#476249).

I am inclined to solve this issue by having update-exim4.conf print a warning if hostname --fqdn does only return a single-component name and leave the rest to the local admin.